Re: [PATCH] tests: fixes test-vmstate.c compile error on msys2

[Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>]

On 05/09/2020 18.16, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 4:48 PM Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com
> <mailto:thuth@redhat.com>> wrote:
> 
>     On 05/09/2020 08.38, Yonggang Luo wrote:
>     > ../tests/test-vmstate.c: In function 'int_cmp':
>     > ../tests/test-vmstate.c:884:5: error: unknown type name 'uint';
>     did you mean 'uInt'?
>     >   884 |     uint ua = GPOINTER_TO_UINT(a);
>     >       |     ^~~~
>     >       |     uInt
>     > ../tests/test-vmstate.c:885:5: error: unknown type name 'uint';
>     did you mean 'uInt'?
>     >   885 |     uint ub = GPOINTER_TO_UINT(b);
>     >       |     ^~~~
>     >       |     uInt
>     > make: *** [Makefile.ninja:5461：tests/test-vmstate.exe.p/test-
>     vmstate.c.obj] 错误 1
>     >
>     > Signed-off-by: Yonggang Luo <luoyonggang@gmail.com
>     <mailto:luoyonggang@gmail.com>>
>     > ---
>     >  tests/test-vmstate.c | 4 ++--
>     >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>     >
>     > diff --git a/tests/test-vmstate.c b/tests/test-vmstate.c
>     > index f7b3868881..f8de709a0b 100644
>     > --- a/tests/test-vmstate.c
>     > +++ b/tests/test-vmstate.c
>     > @@ -881,8 +881,8 @@ static gint interval_cmp(gconstpointer a,
>     gconstpointer b, gpointer user_data)
>     >  /* ID comparison function */
>     >  static gint int_cmp(gconstpointer a, gconstpointer b, gpointer
>     user_data)
>     >  {
>     > -    uint ua = GPOINTER_TO_UINT(a);
>     > -    uint ub = GPOINTER_TO_UINT(b);
>     > +    guint ua = GPOINTER_TO_UINT(a);
>     > +    guint ub = GPOINTER_TO_UINT(b);
>     >      return (ua > ub) - (ua < ub);
>     >  }
> 
>     Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com <mailto:thuth@redhat.com>>
> 
> Does this means quened or to be queued, if that's true, will skip this
> next revision 

No, "Reviewed-by" just means that somebody looked at the patch and
thinks it is right. It does not mean that it is queued yet, but it
certainly helps that the patch gets accepted.
But I've also put the qemu-trivial mailing list on CC: - trivial paches
like this can often get picked up more easily via the trivial queue.
Otherwise this should maybe get merged via the migration tree, or Alex'
or my testing tree.

 Thomas