qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: "John Snow" <jsnow@redhat.com>, "Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
	"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iotests: Do not run the iotests during "make check" anymore
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2019 15:03:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40541b4f-047e-20d9-ded2-7c8679e3de72@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e2463f58-f5f0-7391-0e70-bc2f9970bdfa@redhat.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1937 bytes --]

On 03.10.19 01:51, John Snow wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/2/19 11:50 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 02.10.19 17:10, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> On 02/10/2019 17.03, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 04:21:46PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>>>> Running the iotests during "make check" is causing more headaches than
>>>>> benefits for the block layer maintainers, so let's disable the iotests
>>>>> during "make check" again.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  tests/Makefile.include   | 2 +-
>>>>>  tests/qemu-iotests/group | 2 +-
>>>>>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> I don't have any objection to removing from 'make check', but I feel
>>>> like this commit should be modifying the travis.yml config so that
>>>> it explicitly runs the block tests, otherwise we're loosing automated
>>>> CI and the block tests will increase their rate of bitrot again.
>>>
>>> I was planning to send a separate patch for that (once my Travis builds
>>> are through...), but if it is preferred, I can also send a v2 of this
>>> patch here where I include that change.
>>>
>>> Max, any preferences?
>>
>> I don’t mind either way.  I don’t think we’re in danger of you
>> forgetting to send the Travis patch.
>>
>> As for running the tests on macOS: Good question.  I’d just let them run
>> now and maybe see later whether that decision hurts.  macOS has its own
>> filesystem, so it may be worth testing there.
>>
>> Max
>>
> 
> There are absolutely known bugs and problems using APFS that we have not
> fixed.

Sorry, somehow missed your reply. :-/

Yes, that was the idea why I said that maybe running the tests there
would be worth it, because it’s a different FS that produces, well,
interesting results.

But on second thought, who’s going to address those problems?  So, yeah,
that wouldn’t really help.

Max


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-07 13:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-02 14:21 [PATCH] iotests: Do not run the iotests during "make check" anymore Thomas Huth
2019-10-02 14:39 ` Max Reitz
2019-10-02 15:03 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-10-02 15:10   ` Thomas Huth
2019-10-02 15:50     ` Max Reitz
2019-10-02 23:51       ` John Snow
2019-10-07 13:03         ` Max Reitz [this message]
2019-10-07 19:10           ` John Snow
2019-10-02 17:32   ` Alex Bennée
2019-10-02 17:46     ` Thomas Huth
2019-10-07 10:00 ` Max Reitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40541b4f-047e-20d9-ded2-7c8679e3de72@redhat.com \
    --to=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).