From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BE56j-0003hp-1Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 07:32:37 -0400 Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BE53T-0003Gs-Kx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 07:29:47 -0400 Received: from [203.190.192.17] (helo=wasp.net.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BE51T-0002dt-5x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 07:27:11 -0400 Message-ID: <407E71D7.6060308@wasp.net.au> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 15:28:23 +0400 From: Brad Campbell MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Win2k mouse References: <002801c42260$67c56110$0401a8c0@putte2k> <200404151052.55500.jm@poure.com> <20040415113738.B19597@bbland> In-Reply-To: <20040415113738.B19597@bbland> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Lionel Ulmer wrote: >>In the case of Win2k, appying the ne2000 patch and solving the mouse issue >>would be perfect. Then people can start using Win2k and sending bug reports, >>patches and improvements. > > > In my case, I still have QEMU segfaulting on me during the second stage > installation. Ditto that.. I did get it past there once, but would you belive my hard disk file was 25mb too small and I have not been able to get it to work since :p| Regards, Brad