From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BPgdZ-0004z4-30 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2004 07:50:29 -0400 Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BPgd2-0004vL-9F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2004 07:50:27 -0400 Received: from [80.11.70.253] (helo=aleph.bacbuc.dyndns.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BPgD2-0002Af-N9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2004 07:23:05 -0400 Message-ID: <40A89906.5070107@bacbuc.dyndns.org> Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 12:50:46 +0200 From: Emmanuel Charpentier MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Some trials about W2K Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org First and foremost : I am astonished by the quality of the work that went into qemu. Thuis is the firs time I see a CPU emulator actually usable for "everyday work". It might solf by major hurdle with Linux use at work, i. e. running proprietary Windows software on a Linux workstation... However, I, too, encountered some issues. I saw the same problems as prevous messages reported : - W2KSPx doesn't install (disk full, due to a lot of 1 MB in C:\WINNT\Security) - W2K (no SP) more or less installs (disk full after installation, but that can be cured ...). SP4 update doesn't install. - Timeshift of 3 hours (I am also living in France). Furthermore, I have to report that, whatever way I tried, I failed to install some software : - Office 97 : fails immediately with an error related to not being able to read a .stf file in the CDROM (this happens whether I use a CDROM image or the real device) - mozilla : installation fails during the final install. - OpenOffice.org : fails "silently" (no error message, but no installation either. There might be a small but subtle bug in the virtual machine code ? Furthet thoughs about the virtual machine : I *think* that some improvements can vbe made re: usability. In particular, I wouldn't be adverse to a cleaner solution to networking (tun works, but is awkward). I'll write them after a bit more elaboration. Sincerely, Emmanuel Charpentier