From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.34)
	id 1BQqhA-0001GN-9a
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 May 2004 12:47:00 -0400
Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.34)
	id 1BQqMq-00054c-If
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 May 2004 12:26:32 -0400
Received: from [193.252.22.25] (helo=mwinf0602.wanadoo.fr)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BQqAo-0002wD-4a
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 May 2004 12:13:34 -0400
Received: from bellard.org (ATuileries-112-1-2-219.w80-14.abo.wanadoo.fr
	[80.14.188.219])
	by mwinf0602.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 56A4254000D2
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 20 May 2004 18:13:33 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <40ACD9B9.8070105@bellard.org>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 18:15:53 +0200
From: Fabrice Bellard <fabrice@bellard.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Solaris 9 x86 installation?
References: <874qqzm2po.fsf@Janik.cz>	<200405021527.14094.jahn.matthias@freenet.de>	<874qqyswsp.fsf@Janik.cz>
	<87ad0qpl6a.fsf@Janik.cz>	<40A7689B.30800@bellard.org>
	<40A77A72.8000400@bellard.org>	<873c60peph.fsf@Janik.cz>
	<40A790C0.9020301@bellard.org> <87lljsnx6h.fsf@Janik.cz>
In-Reply-To: <87lljsnx6h.fsf@Janik.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Pavel Janík wrote:
>    From: Fabrice Bellard <fabrice@bellard.org>
>    Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 18:03:12 +0200
> 
>    > I just commited new fixes. Now the hardware scan does not hang and the
>    > OS boot goes a few log lines further.
> 
> Great - I can confirm that - both S9 and S10 continue through complete
> hardware scan and also boot.
> 
>    > The remaining problem may be PCI related (I am not sure whether
>    > Solaris x86 can boot without PCI).

In fact this is not a PCI problem, but a PIC one. With the current CVS 
you can now launch the Solaris x86 kernel :-) I did not try the whole 
install, but it should work much better now.

Fabrice.