From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BSmWv-0005kI-2Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2004 20:44:25 -0400 Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BSmPc-0003s6-NS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2004 20:37:24 -0400 Received: from [199.232.41.8] (helo=mx20.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1BSmGE-0001m5-Jf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2004 20:27:10 -0400 Received: from [62.248.102.122] (helo=fight.it.net.tr) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BSfwm-00086Y-Ku for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2004 13:42:45 -0400 Received: from localhost (fight.it.net.tr [127.0.0.1]) by fight.it.net.tr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69DF2177578 for ; Tue, 25 May 2004 20:39:41 +0300 (EEST) Received: from fight.it.net.tr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (fight.it.net.tr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29779-02 for ; Tue, 25 May 2004 20:39:41 +0300 (EEST) Received: from interaktif.gen.tr (abn151-244.interaktif.net.tr [195.174.151.244]) by fight.it.net.tr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEDB4177574 for ; Tue, 25 May 2004 20:39:40 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <40B4D64D.9050500@interaktif.gen.tr> Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 20:39:25 +0300 From: Emre Ersin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] slow qemu-fast Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi, I have strange problem that qemu runs faster than qemu-fast! Is there an explanation for this? And one more question; which compiler optimization and linking method should I use to have more speed? Emre