From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BUVVY-0002ua-AR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 30 May 2004 14:58:08 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BUVVV-0002sH-IB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 30 May 2004 14:58:07 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BUVVV-0002s7-Ed for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 30 May 2004 14:58:05 -0400 Received: from [81.209.184.159] (helo=dd2718.kasserver.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BUVV5-0002ku-8l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 30 May 2004 14:57:39 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.7] (dsl-082-083-133-246.arcor-ip.net [82.83.133.246]) by dd2718.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B716B514E for ; Sun, 30 May 2004 20:56:00 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40BA2EA1.7020104@fabianowski.de> Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 20:57:37 +0200 From: Bartosz Fabianowski MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Running QEMU on FreeBSD References: <1085865953.93476.3.camel@pcgem.rdg.cyberkinetica.com> <40B902F5.30809@fabianowski.de> <1085867455.93476.10.camel@pcgem.rdg.cyberkinetica.com> <40B90776.60406@fabianowski.de> <1085868567.93476.13.camel@pcgem.rdg.cyberkinetica.com> <40B90DB2.3040508@fabianowski.de> <1085872155.93476.18.camel@pcgem.rdg.cyberkinetica.com> <20040530102509.0f234b19.markus.niemisto@gmx.net> <1085910613.94556.3.camel@pcgem.rdg.cyberkinetica.com> <40B9F2A3.5000707@fabianowski.de> <1085938065.347.1.camel@pcgem.rdg.cyberkinetica.com> In-Reply-To: <1085938065.347.1.camel@pcgem.rdg.cyberkinetica.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Seems like your newest patch merges all the FreeBSD patches floating around out there. Good job. You didn't merge in one small patch of mine though and I am wondering why. The patch I am talking about is the one that makes the configure script look for "sdl11-config" instead of "sdl-config". I have installed the devel/sdl12 port and the name of the executable is "sdl11-config" on my system. It must be "sdl-config" on your system since you didn't include this little patch. And I am curious as to why you have a different file name. How did you install the SDL? From the ports? If so, which port? - Bartosz