From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BXPfa-0001ip-6p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 15:20:30 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BXPfY-0001iB-3X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 15:20:29 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BXPfY-0001i1-0e for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 15:20:28 -0400 Received: from [80.51.58.140] (helo=chilan.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1BXPeX-0004nZ-AZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 15:19:25 -0400 Message-ID: <40C4BE91.2080806@kadu.net> Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 21:14:25 +0200 From: Adrian Smarzewski MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] TUN settings References: <200406071257.34308.hetz@softier.com> <20040607162157.GA19110@sentinelchicken.org> In-Reply-To: <20040607162157.GA19110@sentinelchicken.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tim wrote: | You probably know all of these things, but it doesn't hurt to check: yes and the most important thing is that qemu does not report any errors and I think it should if anything is wrong. Simply no communication. In usermode I can ping the host and that's all. Tun-networking doen't work at all. VMWare works in the same configuration. Kernel 2.6.5 with some gentoo patches. Should I try vanilla kernel sources? - -- Pozdrowienia Adrian Smarzewski -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAxL6RgnuWEmthbpURAiIrAKCPFsze6eK+7m66NW3zg9tYogZEZwCePSqU 3l1/cp+c/swT7PpBKP0Qd7c= =7vyY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----