From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1BY8xv-00054P-1V
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2004 15:42:27 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1BY8xq-00052S-8E
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2004 15:42:23 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BY8xp-00051s-QC
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2004 15:42:21 -0400
Received: from [193.252.22.26] (helo=mwinf0501.wanadoo.fr)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BY8wo-0002Ye-NL
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2004 15:41:18 -0400
Received: from bellard.org (ATuileries-112-1-3-149.w81-48.abo.wanadoo.fr
	[81.48.134.149])
	by mwinf0501.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 4692A40046A
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed,  9 Jun 2004 21:41:17 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <40C76872.9080507@bellard.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 21:43:46 +0200
From: Fabrice Bellard <fabrice@bellard.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] NE2000 problem found
References: <000701c44dfb$540106e0$0401a8c0@putte2k>
In-Reply-To: <000701c44dfb$540106e0$0401a8c0@putte2k>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Mike Nordell wrote:
> ne2000_asic_ioport_write:
>     if (s->dcfg & 0x01) {
>         /* 16 bit access */
> +        assert(s->rcnt >= 2);
> +        assert(s->rsar + 2 <= s->stop);
>         ne2000_mem_writew(s, s->rsar, val);
>         s->rsar += 2;
>         s->rcnt -= 2;
>     }
> 
> First assert triggered with:
> s->dcfg: 0x49
> s->rcnt: 1
> s->rsar: 0x4156
> s->stop: 0xc000
> 
> What surprises me the most is that it's coming from an outb, not outw. Is
> this really correct, or is the ne2000 emulation perhaps missing a
> differentiation between 16- and 8-bit I/O?

It is correct : the size of the transfer is determined by dcfg, not by 
the width of the I/O instruction.

> I'll add *readb/writeb locally, to see if things go better, and report
> findings/patch.

Can you tell me exactly in which case you have problems with NE2000 ?

BTW, did someone find why Windows XP has security problems in QEMU ? It 
seems related to the networking (the Safe mode without networking works, 
but not the one with networking), but I don't have enough knowledge of 
Windows to go further.

Fabrice.