From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Bkg4R-0000Hl-Kb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 05:28:59 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Bkg4P-0000H4-Vg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 05:28:59 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Bkg4P-0000Gv-QS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 05:28:57 -0400 Received: from [61.8.3.250] (helo=mail.xplantechnology.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1Bkg1Y-0004iF-JI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 05:26:00 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.xplantechnology.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41B7C501F2 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 19:25:55 +1000 (EST) Received: from mail.xplantechnology.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (wimp.xden.xplantechnology.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09041-02 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 19:25:54 +1000 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.23] (dsl-210-11-209-55.syd.level10.net.au [210.11.209.55]) by mail.xplantechnology.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C1D45000E for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 09:25:54 +0000 (Australia/Sydney) Message-ID: <40F4FC21.8050000@xplantechnology.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 19:25:53 +1000 From: Luke Deller MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEmu 0.6.0 and FreeDOS on XP Host get 100% CPU usage References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Natalia Portillo wrote: > In qemu isn't implemented idle. > > So when the emulated cpu is idle, the emulation is not. > That's the reason. I don't think that is true, because when I run Windows XP as a guest in qemu, the qemu process doesn't use 100% CPU unless something is actually running in Windows. I suspect that Andreas gets 100% CPU usage with a FreeDOS guest because FreeDOS doesn't do CPU idle... that's not how DOS works. It's not much of an operating system at all, really. Luke.