From: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
To: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: alex.williamson@redhat.com, clg@redhat.com,
eric.auger@redhat.com, joao.m.martins@oracle.com,
chao.p.peng@intel.com, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
"open list:S390 general arch..." <qemu-s390x@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] vfio/ccw: Don't initialize HOST_IOMMU_DEVICE with mdev
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 10:57:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40cf2370a1838b1aa1e9eb2cfc75a0543ceb45bd.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240722070713.1342711-3-zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>
On Mon, 2024-07-22 at 15:07 +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
> mdevs aren't "physical" devices and when asking for backing IOMMU info,
> it fails the entire provisioning of the guest. Fix that by setting
> vbasedev->mdev true so skipping HostIOMMUDevice initialization in the
> presence of mdevs.
Hmm, picking the two commits that Cedric mentioned in his cover-letter reply [1] doesn't "fail the entire provisioning of the guest" for me.
Applying this patch on top of that causes the call from vfio_attach_device() to hiod_legacy_vfio_realize() to be skipped, which seems odd. What am I missing?
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/4c9a184b-514c-4276-95ca-9ed86623b9a4@redhat.com/
>
> Fixes: 930589520128 ("vfio/iommufd: Implement HostIOMMUDeviceClass::realize() handler")
> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>
> ---
> hw/vfio/ccw.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/ccw.c b/hw/vfio/ccw.c
> index 1f8e1272c7..70934b01d5 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/ccw.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/ccw.c
> @@ -675,6 +675,9 @@ static void vfio_ccw_instance_init(Object *obj)
> VFIOCCWDevice *vcdev = VFIO_CCW(obj);
> VFIODevice *vbasedev = &vcdev->vdev;
>
> + /* CCW device is mdev type device */
> + vbasedev->mdev = true;
> +
> /*
> * All vfio-ccw devices are believed to operate in a way compatible with
> * discarding of memory in RAM blocks, ie. pages pinned in the host are
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-22 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-22 7:07 [PATCH 0/2] Don't initialize HOST_IOMMU_DEVICE with mdev Zhenzhong Duan
2024-07-22 7:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] vfio/ap: " Zhenzhong Duan
2024-07-22 9:18 ` Joao Martins
2024-07-22 15:46 ` Anthony Krowiak
2024-07-22 15:52 ` Joao Martins
2024-07-22 7:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] vfio/ccw: " Zhenzhong Duan
2024-07-22 9:18 ` Joao Martins
2024-07-22 14:57 ` Eric Farman [this message]
2024-07-22 15:09 ` Joao Martins
2024-07-22 15:36 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-07-22 17:45 ` Eric Farman
2024-07-23 2:52 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2024-07-22 9:31 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Eric Auger
2024-07-22 10:02 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-07-22 13:50 ` Cédric Le Goater
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40cf2370a1838b1aa1e9eb2cfc75a0543ceb45bd.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@intel.com \
--cc=clg@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=zhenzhong.duan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).