From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BrNkR-0004mP-89 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Aug 2004 17:20:03 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BrNkO-0004lU-EU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Aug 2004 17:20:02 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BrNkO-0004lP-93 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Aug 2004 17:20:00 -0400 Received: from [195.188.213.8] (helo=smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BrNgW-00034k-OT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Aug 2004 17:16:00 -0400 Message-ID: <410D5D8D.4020102@blueyonder.co.uk> Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2004 22:15:57 +0100 From: Ross Kendall Axe MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Best way to get 6GB = 3 x 2GB + soft raid? References: <76bfb9d2040801091719aafb43@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ronald wrote: | Le Sun, 01 Aug 2004 12:17:22 -0400, Garth Dahlstrom a écrit : | | The next limitation could be your file system if you are using fat | with an old windows that is 4G, don't know about ntfs. 2GB actually on FAT32, regardless of Windows version. If the OP is using a 'doze version that's so old as to not support FAT32, he's screwed anyway really. I believe NTFS can do better, at least in recent versions. Ross -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBDV2L9bR4xmappRARAuqtAKChN8xmh+wYEEBm3rYowvVkwAInaQCgsJ+4 S3+L1Z9F90Q2VuBtxS8ayHM= =60C4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----