From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1BrVHq-00020P-Ru
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2004 01:23:02 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1BrVHp-000204-5E
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2004 01:23:02 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BrVHp-0001zq-0k
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2004 01:23:01 -0400
Received: from [195.188.213.6] (helo=smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BrVEI-0005zH-GI
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2004 01:19:22 -0400
Message-ID: <410DCED8.30306@blueyonder.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 06:19:20 +0100
From: Ross Kendall Axe <ross.axe@blueyonder.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Re: Best way to get 6GB = 3 x 2GB + soft raid?
References: <76bfb9d2040801091719aafb43@mail.gmail.com>	<pan.2004.08.01.16.43.42.24374@reply.to>	<410D5D8D.4020102@blueyonder.co.uk>	<pan.2004.08.01.21.30.02.649159@reply.to>
	<20040801224219.GB12375@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040801224219.GB12375@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jim C. Brown wrote:
| On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 11:30:11PM +0200, Ronald wrote:
|
|>Le Sun, 01 Aug 2004 22:15:57 +0100, Ross Kendall Axe a ?crit?:
|>
|>
|>>Ronald wrote:
|>>| Le Sun, 01 Aug 2004 12:17:22 -0400, Garth Dahlstrom a ?crit :
|>>|
|>>|
|>>| The next limitation could be your file system if you are using fat with
|>>| an old windows that is 4G, don't know about ntfs.
|>>
|>>2GB actually on FAT32, regardless of Windows version. If the OP is
using a
|>>'doze version that's so old as to not support FAT32, he's screwed anyway
|>>really. I believe NTFS can do better, at least in recent versions.
|>>
|>
|>I think that the 2Gb limitation is true only with linux vfat drivers and
|>win can write files =< 4Gb on fat32.
|

Yes, Windows 2000 and Linux 2.6.3 both seem to be able to write >2GB
files on FAT32. Apologies for the miscorrection.

Ross

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBDc7W9bR4xmappRARAmTPAJ9k+zhwYW88MMNKxSf1neqFdu5sKgCg3RHa
qXX150fbvRV0e9BjfPXjQ2U=
=iJZo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----