From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C06SN-0001Qp-1b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 18:41:27 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C06SL-0001Q6-E1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 18:41:25 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C06SL-0001Q3-Bo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 18:41:25 -0400 Received: from [129.104.30.34] (helo=a.mx.polytechnique.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C06NS-0007p1-1m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 18:36:22 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by djali.m4x.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31BD133191 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 00:36:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from djali.m4x.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (djali [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTP id 17945-06 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 00:36:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from bellard.org (nas-cbv-3-213-228-58-253.dial.proxad.net [213.228.58.253]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ssl.polytechnique.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20BAA3317C for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 00:36:20 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <412D147D.3020803@bellard.org> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 00:36:45 +0200 From: Fabrice Bellard MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] chroot to ARM Gentoo install. References: <200408241238.32517.james@alentdesignsolutions.com> <200408242244.39081.paul@codesourcery.com> <412BBDB8.40106@bellard.org> <200408242326.58150.paul@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <200408242326.58150.paul@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Paul Brook wrote: >>Now you can begin Strong ARM system mode emulation ! Simulating a >>Netwinder hardware should be possible with the existing PC devices. > > > First we'd need to implement privileged CPU modes, system control coprocessor, > and maybe MMU... > > I'm a toolchain developer, not a kernel hacker, so I'm mostly interested in > user-mode emulation. Full system emulation is probably not gonna happen > unless I get really bored, or someone else does it ;) > > Armv6 (ie arm11 series cores) and VFP coprocessor are higher priority for me. OK. I'll try to merge your last ARM patch ASAP. I am curious to know what speed you get in user mode emulation. Fabrice.