From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1C2GrQ-000184-W9
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 18:12:17 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1C2GrO-000172-Ia
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 18:12:16 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C2GrO-00016x-FC
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 18:12:14 -0400
Received: from [213.165.64.20] (helo=mail.gmx.net)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C2GmL-0007Iw-OF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 18:07:02 -0400
Message-ID: <4134F602.2030809@gmx.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 00:04:50 +0200
From: "Bochnig, Martin" <mb1x@gmx.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] SPARC - host support in vl.c
Reply-To: bochnig@pool.math.tu-berlin.de, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Here my patch suggestions to add SPARC host support to vl.c :


#elif defined(__sparc__)

  /* Derived from: "m68k updates #2" by Richard Zidlicky
  "crude hack to get some sort of rdtsc support" */

#include <sys/time.h>
static int64_t cputicks=0;
static struct timeval lastcptcall={0,0};

// assume 5 MHz Pentium, min 80 ticks between rdtsc calls

int64_t cpu_get_real_ticks(void)
{
      struct timeval tp;
      gettimeofday(&tp,(void*)0);
      if (tp.tv_sec == lastcptcall.tv_sec &&
         tp.tv_usec == lastcptcall.tv_usec ){
        cputicks += 1;
      } else {
        cputicks=0;
        lastcptcall=tp;
      }
      return ((int64_t)tp.tv_sec*1000000+tp.tv_usec)*5+cputicks;
}


#elif defined(__sparc64__)

/* I'm not sure it was worth it, personally.
*
*UltraSparc:
*
*  unsigned long x;
*  asm volatile ("rd %tick, %0" : "=r"(x));
*
* Earlier Sparcs do not have this feature.
*
*
*/

int64_t cpu_get_real_ticks(void)
{
     int64_t val;
    asm volatile ("rd %%tick, %0" : "=r"(val));
     return val;
}

#else
#error unsupported CPU
#endif

Any ideas would be appreciated.

Martin