From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CGR76-0001Di-EU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2004 19:59:00 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CGR75-0001DA-Ht for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2004 19:58:59 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CGR75-0001D7-EU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2004 19:58:59 -0400 Received: from [194.90.9.27] (helo=mxout4.netvision.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CGQzr-0008HC-Ki for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2004 19:51:31 -0400 Received: from [10.0.0.151] ([217.132.192.170]) by mxout4.netvision.net.il (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTPA id <0I5C00HTWCXDYZ@mxout4.netvision.net.il> for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 10 Oct 2004 01:51:14 +0200 (IST) Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 01:51:11 +0200 From: Hetz Ben Hamo Message-id: <4168796F.1070304@dad-answers.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: [Qemu-devel] NT 4 status Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi, I just tried the latest cvs with 2GB virtual disk, and here's the status: 1. At first install it seems to go everything ok (No parameters when launching qemu, just the -cdrom iso image name -hda for the hard disk image). However, upon finishing install and rebooting (quitting qemu, removing the -boot parameter) it's just says "booting from hard disk" and its just sits there idle. 2. Trying to re-install NT on the same partition without any paramaters change in QEMU - and it shows that the virtual disk has more then 1024 cylinders and it warns you.. 3. Using -isa gives you the ability to install, but upon finishing - it's trying to boot the new hard disk but gives an I/O error at the boot beginning... Suggestions? Thanks, Hetz