qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ML <ml@railnet.it>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Speed comparison
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 13:58:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <416923EC.2060801@railnet.it> (raw)

Hi all!
I have been using Qemu for a while now and first of all let me thank and
congratulate all of you developers on a great, *GREAT* work so far!
The first time I used Qemu I couldn't believe my eyes: it is fast, solid, smart!
It's a real godsend for all developers who need to test applications on
different platforms without continuous rebooting or switching from one computer
to another.
Just GREAT!!!

I don't know whether this has been answered before (or if there is an obvious
answer to this question), I have made some searching in the mailing list but
couldn't find anything in the near past.

The thing is that I'm using Qemu on a Slackware linux host running both Win98
and WinXP guests.
I have noticed that the very same Windows application, which uses intensive
math calculations, is way faster (at least twice as much) on the Win98 guest
compared to the WinXP one.
I am not talking about graphic rendering and stuff, just the plain time needed
to perform the same math calculations.
As a confirmation to this, on a general level Win98 guest's overall performance 
seems much better than XP's.

I was just curious to know if this behavior can be related to something
intrinsic to XP and 98 internals or if there are other Qemu related
explanations (and possible fine tunings).

TIA and keep up the fantastic work!

Ciao,
Piero

             reply	other threads:[~2004-10-10 12:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-10 11:58 ML [this message]
2004-10-10 17:54 ` [Qemu-devel] Speed comparison Johannes Schindelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=416923EC.2060801@railnet.it \
    --to=ml@railnet.it \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).