From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E2EC18E5B for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 08:56:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 392F920674 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 08:56:09 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 392F920674 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:54664 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jE81A-0004QP-Eg for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 04:56:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57988) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jE80O-0003vx-Pg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 04:55:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jE80N-0003BK-44 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 04:55:19 -0400 Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:64139) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jE80M-0002Lr-QL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 04:55:19 -0400 IronPort-SDR: rFliY/Y+Sk1i87aWN6vw9sAXpGME3Xy1VWUFvcUhuIODDqCB/wwu7mWfxGdSgJPQzFamq5drsT GWWl1BOXCZhQ== X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Mar 2020 01:55:14 -0700 IronPort-SDR: ZTnAPo6wvnA4Yo89kkAKT/aCslMd5FSd7jttqw+YuvVIn+LrNXCBxQqhaN9UdY611TcHV4v9pi d4YUnja+EySg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,563,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="267893087" Received: from coxu-arch-shz.sh.intel.com (HELO [10.239.160.52]) ([10.239.160.52]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Mar 2020 01:55:13 -0700 Subject: Re: [PULL 09/61] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Guest X86 HAXM CPUs To: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org References: <1584394048-44994-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1584394048-44994-10-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> From: Colin Xu Message-ID: <41756673-bbd4-593f-ade8-3232db8b512e@intel.com> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 16:55:12 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: FreeBSD 9.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 134.134.136.100 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Colin.Xu@intel.com Cc: Wenchao Wang , Hang Yuan Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 2020-03-17 16:26, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 17/03/20 08:46, Colin Xu wrote: >> Hi Paolo, >> >> For future HAX patch, once it's "Reviewed-by" haxm maintainers and other >> reviewers, do we need "SubmitAPullRequest" separately or you will do it >> together with other patches? > As you prefer. I wouldn't mind having to send fewer pull requests. :) > > Paolo Would you mind continue help HAX send pull request? It feels like easier to track the changes when stay together with other accelerator patches. We'll regularly check the reviewed patches and do necessary tests, and send you a list of patches that can be queued for next pull. What do you think? Colin -- Best Regards, Colin Xu