* [Qemu-devel] ROM sources and checkout dates or versions
@ 2004-12-23 13:40 Guillem Jover
2004-12-23 22:26 ` Fabrice Bellard
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Guillem Jover @ 2004-12-23 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Hi,
We've a problem packaging current qemu sources for Debian, as they
contain binaries without sources (namely the roms), thus forcing us
to repackage the upstream tarball to remove them. Also due to that,
we've started depending on an external package providing the Bochs
bios binary, but then now we have some problems with the emulated
network card. See for example:
<http://bugs.debian.org/285752>
<http://bugs.debian.org/284132>
I'd like to know if it would be possible to include the sources for
those roms, so we can easily reproduce the same binaries from source,
and be able to use the pristine source tarball as well. Otherwise
having the checkout dates or exact version used would be of help,
although a bit cumbersome.
thanks,
guillem
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] ROM sources and checkout dates or versions
2004-12-23 13:40 [Qemu-devel] ROM sources and checkout dates or versions Guillem Jover
@ 2004-12-23 22:26 ` Fabrice Bellard
2004-12-24 10:08 ` Guillem Jover
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Fabrice Bellard @ 2004-12-23 22:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel; +Cc: guillem
Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We've a problem packaging current qemu sources for Debian, as they
> contain binaries without sources (namely the roms), thus forcing us
> to repackage the upstream tarball to remove them. Also due to that,
> we've started depending on an external package providing the Bochs
> bios binary, but then now we have some problems with the emulated
> network card. See for example:
>
> <http://bugs.debian.org/285752>
> <http://bugs.debian.org/284132>
>
> I'd like to know if it would be possible to include the sources for
> those roms, so we can easily reproduce the same binaries from source,
> and be able to use the pristine source tarball as well. Otherwise
> having the checkout dates or exact version used would be of help,
> although a bit cumbersome.
Hi,
It is a bad idea to use the BIOSes from Bochs because QEMU has specific
patches. Moreover, the recent Bochs BIOS may be incompatible with QEMU
(I need to look at them). You should include the QEMU BIOSes as-is in an
architecture independent Debian package.
I am relunctant to provide the source code because it would duplicate
the code from Bochs and it would need a build process I am not ready to
support. The provided diffs are suffisant to build the BIOS because they
give the date and CVS version of the corresponding Bochs code.
Fabrice.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] ROM sources and checkout dates or versions
2004-12-23 22:26 ` Fabrice Bellard
@ 2004-12-24 10:08 ` Guillem Jover
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Guillem Jover @ 2004-12-24 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 11:26:12PM +0100, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
> It is a bad idea to use the BIOSes from Bochs because QEMU has specific
> patches.
As I maintain the Debian Bochs packages as well, I have applied
those patches already, no problem here. :>
> Moreover, the recent Bochs BIOS may be incompatible with QEMU
> (I need to look at them).
Well, yes that seems to be what we are experiencing. I'll try
latest Bochs CVS snapshots.
> You should include the QEMU BIOSes as-is in an
> architecture independent Debian package.
>
> I am relunctant to provide the source code because it would duplicate
> the code from Bochs and it would need a build process I am not ready to
> support.
Yes I can understand, and it would duplicate the code as well on
Debian, but we'll need those sources anyway if we have to provide a
standalone package for the BIOSes, we cannot ship binaries without
sources.
At least for Debian needs, just providing the sources in tarball
form and not supporting the build process would be just fine,
although suboptimal for all. But we can understand you may not
want that. =)
> The provided diffs are suffisant to build the BIOS because they
> give the date and CVS version of the corresponding Bochs code.
Ok, if the patches are resyned on every release that would be enough.
thanks,
guillem
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-12-24 11:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-12-23 13:40 [Qemu-devel] ROM sources and checkout dates or versions Guillem Jover
2004-12-23 22:26 ` Fabrice Bellard
2004-12-24 10:08 ` Guillem Jover
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).