From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Co8mn-0005BV-Sd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:17:24 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Co8mW-000506-CE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:17:04 -0500 Received: from [129.104.30.34] (helo=mx1.polytechnique.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Co8UI-0001ul-LZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:58:14 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by djali.polytechnique.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62C4B331B8 for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 23:58:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from djali.polytechnique.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26220-05 for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 23:58:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from [84.99.204.123] (unknown [84.99.204.123]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ssl.polytechnique.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33AA73319B for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 23:58:12 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <41E308AF.908@bellard.org> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 23:58:55 +0100 From: Fabrice Bellard MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Win32 build References: <41E09627.1020802@volny.cz> In-Reply-To: <41E09627.1020802@volny.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Filip Navara wrote: > Index: target-i386/ops_template.h > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvsroot/qemu/qemu/target-i386/ops_template.h,v > retrieving revision 1.8 > diff -u -r1.8 ops_template.h > --- target-i386/ops_template.h 3 Jan 2005 23:50:08 -0000 1.8 > +++ target-i386/ops_template.h 9 Jan 2005 02:18:37 -0000 > @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ > #define SUFFIX q > #define DATA_TYPE uint64_t > #define DATA_STYPE int64_t > -#define DATA_MASK 0xffffffffffffffff > +#define DATA_MASK 0xffffffffffffffffULL > #else > #error unhandled operand size > #endif Is this really needed to compile ? Fabrice.