Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] hw/dma: Use dma_addr_t type definition when relevant

[David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>]

On 04.01.22 09:54, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> 
> Update the obvious places where dma_addr_t should be used
> (instead of uint64_t, hwaddr, size_t, int32_t types).
> 
> This allows to have &dma_addr_t type portable on 32/64-bit
> hosts.
> 
> Move QEMUSGList declaration after dma_addr_t declaration
> so this structure can use the new type.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
> ---
>  include/sysemu/dma.h  | 22 +++++++++++-----------
>  hw/nvme/ctrl.c        |  2 +-
>  hw/rdma/rdma_utils.c  |  2 +-
>  hw/scsi/megasas.c     | 10 +++++-----
>  softmmu/dma-helpers.c |  6 +++---
>  5 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/sysemu/dma.h b/include/sysemu/dma.h
> index 0db2478a506..7a8ae4fcd0b 100644
> --- a/include/sysemu/dma.h
> +++ b/include/sysemu/dma.h
> @@ -15,22 +15,11 @@
>  #include "block/block.h"
>  #include "block/accounting.h"
>  
> -typedef struct ScatterGatherEntry ScatterGatherEntry;
> -
>  typedef enum {
>      DMA_DIRECTION_TO_DEVICE = 0,
>      DMA_DIRECTION_FROM_DEVICE = 1,
>  } DMADirection;
>  
> -struct QEMUSGList {
> -    ScatterGatherEntry *sg;
> -    int nsg;
> -    int nalloc;
> -    size_t size;
> -    DeviceState *dev;
> -    AddressSpace *as;
> -};
> -
>  /*
>   * When an IOMMU is present, bus addresses become distinct from
>   * CPU/memory physical addresses and may be a different size.  Because
> @@ -43,6 +32,17 @@ typedef uint64_t dma_addr_t;
>  #define DMA_ADDR_BITS 64
>  #define DMA_ADDR_FMT "%" PRIx64
>  
> +typedef struct ScatterGatherEntry ScatterGatherEntry;
> +
> +struct QEMUSGList {
> +    ScatterGatherEntry *sg;
> +    int nsg;
> +    int nalloc;
> +    dma_addr_t size;
> +    DeviceState *dev;
> +    AddressSpace *as;
> +};

Changing one member while moving is sneaky. Why the move in this patch?

Apart from that and Peters comment

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb