From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CzoqI-0005nC-CK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:25:14 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Czoq4-0005ew-Jh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:25:02 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Czoq0-0005cL-DB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:24:56 -0500 Received: from [64.233.170.202] (helo=rproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CzoXs-0006Yx-9D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 23:06:12 -0500 Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id f1so813318rne for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 20:06:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <41e41e7a05021120066a40420c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 06:06:10 +0200 From: Hetz Ben Hamo Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: The QEMU Accelerator Module In-Reply-To: <1108178633.7659.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <420BEEB7.1010906@bellard.org> <1108178633.7659.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> Reply-To: Hetz Ben Hamo , qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: esrever_otua@pythonhacker.is-a-geek.net, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hmm, I don't mind hosting the kqemu module, whether as a CVS or as snapshots (or both) .... Thanks, Hetz On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 16:23:53 +1300, Darryl Dixon wrote: > Please Johannes, > > No-one has suggested that Fabrice should work for nothing; that was not > a fair comment at all. Many people on this list (myself included) have in > fact offered finance to see the accelerator module GPL'ed (if that is > possible). The question Anand asked is eminently reasonable and for > perfectly practical reasons it needs to be resolved one way or the other > (e.g. if the accel module must be hosted elsewhere, would it be best to move > the whole project so everything stays in one place?). An equally unfair > counter-question would be 'is it fair to use freely provided hosting that > cost other people real money and break their TOS?' > > I for one am happy to see the existence of this module in any form at > all, but that doesn't mean that certain practical matters can be ignored. > In fact, the Wine project just recently grappled with the same issue with > (IIRC) Microsoft's DCOM redistributable and their sourceforge hosting. In > the end they now host it elsewhere. Perhaps Fabrice could get an exception > from the Savannah team if they are asked? > > Many regards, > Darryl Dixon > > > On Sat, 2005-02-12 at 03:01 +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi, On Sat, 12 Feb 2005, Anand Kumria wrote: > Is it really fair to > distribute a proprietary module from a free software > source code > repository? Is it really fair to expect others to work for nothing at all? > Hth, Dscho _______________________________________________ Qemu-devel > mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel > -- > Darryl Dixon > _______________________________________________ > Qemu-devel mailing list > Qemu-devel@nongnu.org > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel > > >