From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DQs70-0001Wj-R5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 15:22:18 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DQs6z-0001WX-7s
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 15:22:18 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DQs6z-0000Xb-5I
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 15:22:17 -0400
Received: from [64.233.170.195] (helo=rproxy.gmail.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DQs9V-0006Ok-RI
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 15:24:54 -0400
Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z35so355227rne
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 12:21:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <41e41e7a05042712214dc083bf@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:21:02 +0200
From: Hetz Ben Hamo <hetzbh@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KQemu on AMD64 or PPC?
In-Reply-To: <d4omcp$6et$1@sea.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <200503011331.45299.jasong@ccgr.org> <d4omcp$6et$1@sea.gmane.org>
Reply-To: Hetz Ben Hamo <hetzbh@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

KQEMU on AMD64 is coming soon... (don't know when though)..

Thanks,
Hetz


On 4/27/05, Rudi Lippert <Rudi@lyrikpage.de> wrote:
> I am using QEMU (not KQemu) on AMD64 and I would gladly test KQemu on my
> computer.
> If you (Fabrice) could build KQemu for AMD64, I will inform you of any
> success or failure I experience. In the meantime, I'd suggest you provide=
 a
> proper error message for users trying to build QEMU with KQemu support,
> since it is just not supported.
> Cheers,
>=20
> Rudi
>=20
>=20
> Jason Gress wrote:
>=20
> > As I have been messing around with KQemu, I have really liked the
> > performance
> > gain.  I even tried a 2D-only game, and it worked quite well!  The majo=
r
> > performance problem I saw was mostly graphics related from what I can s=
ee.
> > You can see each frame update; I am sure with a faster graphics
> > engine/driver that mapped to a fast display protocol (OpenGL?) it would=
 be
> > a lot better. That, or my ATI's 2D performance with SDL is a lot slower
> > than I thought.
> > Thoughts?  ;)  Sound has also improved a lot, so kudos there as well!
> >
> > One thing I am wondering is if/when AMD64 or other hosts will get to se=
e
> > these
> > improvements.  I understand that PPC would of course only KQemu on a PP=
C
> > client, but what about AMD64?  Will i386 (or x86_64) clients be able to
> > see
> > these improvements, or will the kernel module not compile at this time?=
  I
> > don't have access to an AMD64 system right now, or I'd give it a shot. =
 I
> > am curious, as I have a friend with an AMD64, and I'd like to get one
> > sometime
> > this year.  Of course, hopefully Fabrice gets a job ;) and we can all p=
lay
> > with a completely open source version of KQemu by then! :)
> >
> > Jason
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Qemu-devel mailing list
> Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
>