From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DgGSE-0002q1-8x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 02:23:50 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DgGS0-0002kV-LN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 02:23:48 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DgGRy-0002Sr-Ox for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 02:23:35 -0400 Received: from [64.233.170.198] (helo=rproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DgGCp-0008V2-Ve for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 02:07:56 -0400 Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id j1so425609rnf for ; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 23:07:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <41e41e7a050606152194853d3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 00:21:26 +0200 From: Hetz Ben Hamo Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Mac OS X at native speed... In-Reply-To: <42A49E6F.7030501@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <42A49E6F.7030501@gmx.de> Reply-To: Hetz Ben Hamo , qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Not exactly... As many Apple fans can tell you, apple just love to stick their own ROM in there machines (I think it's called open firmware these days). Since your own PC doesn't have this ROM (and I imagine they'll add couple of tricks more to the package) - you won't be able even to install OS X on an avrage PC you buy on the market, unless it came from Apple. Compiling QEMU under OS-X/Pentium machine, that could be another story with more more success... Thanks, Hetz On 6/6/05, Oliver Gerlich wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 >=20 > Could this: > http://apple.slashdot.org/apple/05/06/06/1752234.shtml?tid=3D118&tid=3D17= 9&tid=3D3 > help to run Mac OS X at near-native speed on x86? I'd really like to try > OS X myself, but money-wise Qemu will most likely be the only way for me= ... > So maybe this switch to x86 could eliminate any byte ordering slowdowns > and make it run as fast as x86-on-x86? >=20 > Curious about comments from insiders, > Oliver Gerlich > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) >=20 > iD8DBQFCpJ5tTFOM6DcNJ6cRAmPqAJ4vpF8B8KETNVd3hPhC6MEpa13DiQCgmM4t > uNq6QoDKyFyMiZia3hYdllI=3D > =3DVOCw > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Qemu-devel mailing list > Qemu-devel@nongnu.org > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel >