From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dwhwv-0004M6-AF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:59:30 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dwhwp-0004JB-6B for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:59:27 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dwhwm-00044b-Pt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:59:20 -0400 Received: from [64.233.182.195] (helo=nproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Dwhn9-0000qQ-HA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:49:24 -0400 Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id h2so91227nfe for ; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 07:38:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <41e41e7a05072407389b35475@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:38:26 +0200 From: Hetz Ben Hamo Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu exec-all.h In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: Reply-To: Hetz Ben Hamo , qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Fabrice Bellard How much is it useful? is it a good enough solution to install win9x with k= qemu? Thanks, Hetz > Modified files: > . : exec-all.h >=20 > Log message: > temporary work around for 16 bit code in kqemu