From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F77RL-0000MA-Me
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2006 03:46:11 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F77RJ-0000LN-SR
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2006 03:46:11 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F77RJ-0000LJ-MG
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2006 03:46:09 -0500
Received: from [66.249.92.197] (helo=uproxy.gmail.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F77Uo-0001su-Eo
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2006 03:49:47 -0500
Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id j40so111005ugd
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 09 Feb 2006 00:46:07 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <41e41e7a0602090046p18e89050m79c914f5293b2ade@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 10:46:07 +0200
From: Hetz Ben Hamo <hetzbh@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] -kernel-kqemu
In-Reply-To: <20060209012752.GA30423@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20060208230434.GA28760@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org>
	<20060209012752.GA30423@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Hi,

I=B4m sorry, but I=B4ve been following the CVS commits and I haven=B4t
understood this new option (fabrice has not written anything to this
list about it and what it does for the end user).

Could someone please shed some light for me and others who didn=B4t
understand whats going on please?

Thanks,
Hetz

On 2/9/06, Jim C. Brown <jma5@umd.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 06:04:35PM -0500, Jim C. Brown wrote:
> > This sounds like an interesting option. Qemu has moved one step closer =
to
> > VMware...
> >
>
> I should probably add, that this new option (-kernel-kqemu) allows for sp=
eeds
> very close to VMware because it allows kqemu to virtualize most ring 0 co=
de
> (in addition to ring 3 code).
>
> Can't wait to see qvm86 make use of the new API.
>
> > --
> > Infinite complexity begets infinite beauty.
> > Infinite precision begets infinite perfection.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Qemu-devel mailing list
> > Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
> >
>
> --
> Infinite complexity begets infinite beauty.
> Infinite precision begets infinite perfection.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qemu-devel mailing list
> Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
>