From: "Hetz Ben Hamo" <hetzbh@gmail.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] why is kqemu closed?
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 17:55:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41e41e7a0604100855q5d2b2289hf392309c5ed37574@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3ef9fbda81a71790b3cc0575ebf95538@localhost>
> I'm sure that Fabrice knows and that I'm beating a dead horse, but this is (strictly speaking, discussions pending ;^)) violating the linux kernel license agreement.
Actually it doesn't, as kqemu is not part of any kernel. it's just
another closed source module as nvidia's module as well as some
others. It his choice to choose whatever he wants to releae it under a
closed source license or any other license.
--
Visit my blog (hebrew) for things that (sometimes) matter:
http://wp.dad-answers.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-10 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-10 15:16 [Qemu-devel] why is kqemu closed? Rakotomandimby Mihamina
2006-04-10 15:20 ` Hetz Ben Hamo
2006-04-10 15:47 ` Auke Kok
2006-04-10 15:55 ` Hetz Ben Hamo [this message]
2006-04-10 15:56 ` Leonardo E. Reiter
2006-04-11 4:37 ` Auke Kok
2006-04-11 7:58 ` Brad Campbell
2006-04-11 16:22 ` Jim C. Brown
2006-04-11 8:37 ` Ricardo Almeida
2006-04-11 9:46 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-04-11 10:05 ` Jamie Lokier
2006-04-11 15:05 ` Leonardo E. Reiter
2006-04-11 15:14 ` Jonas Maebe
2006-04-11 15:25 ` Jim C. Brown
2006-04-11 16:04 ` Jonas Maebe
2006-04-11 15:36 ` Paul Brook
2006-04-11 15:43 ` M. Warner Losh
2006-04-11 16:00 ` Paul Brook
2006-04-11 16:29 ` M. Warner Losh
2006-04-11 16:09 ` Jim C. Brown
2006-04-11 17:10 ` Enough already! " Bakul Shah
2006-04-11 15:17 ` Sebastian Kaliszewski
2006-04-11 15:31 ` M. Warner Losh
2006-04-11 12:33 ` andrzej zaborowski
2006-04-11 13:58 ` Jamie Lokier
2006-04-11 15:10 ` Sebastian Kaliszewski
2006-04-11 15:19 ` M. Warner Losh
2006-04-10 15:57 ` Brett (Mare) Henley
2006-04-10 16:02 ` Leonardo E. Reiter
2006-04-10 19:11 ` M. Warner Losh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41e41e7a0604100855q5d2b2289hf392309c5ed37574@mail.gmail.com \
--to=hetzbh@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).