From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IjwYi-0005kK-Ku
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 08:39:04 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IjwYg-0005ja-Vo
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 08:39:04 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IjwYg-0005jT-RB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 08:39:02 -0400
Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.232])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <hetzbh@gmail.com>) id 1IjwYg-0004RD-IA
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 08:39:02 -0400
Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c38so1717950wra
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 05:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <41e41e7a0710220538j7b12c6b9l3d86d081d29541a4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:38:59 +0200
From: "Hetz Ben Hamo" <hetzbh@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, RFC] USB OHCI isochronous transfers support
In-Reply-To: <64F9B87B6B770947A9F8391472E032160E323229@ehost011-8.exch011.intermedia.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_13981_13548286.1193056739841"
References: <64F9B87B6B770947A9F8391472E032160E323223@ehost011-8.exch011.intermedia.net>
	<64F9B87B6B770947A9F8391472E032160E323229@ehost011-8.exch011.intermedia.net>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

------=_Part_13981_13548286.1193056739841
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi Itamar,

On 22/10/2007, Itamar Heim <Itamar.Heim@qumranet.com> wrote:
>
> So this is isochronous for usb 2.0?
>

last I checked, OHCI is for USB 1.x, EHCI was for 2.0.

Thanks,
Hetz
-- 
Skepticism is the lazy person's default position.
my blog (hebrew): http://benhamo.org

------=_Part_13981_13548286.1193056739841
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi Itamar,<br><div style="text-align: left;"><br></div><span class="gmail_quote">On 22/10/2007, <b class="gmail_sendername">Itamar Heim</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:Itamar.Heim@qumranet.com">Itamar.Heim@qumranet.com</a>&gt; wrote:
</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">So this is isochronous for usb 2.0?<br></blockquote><div style="text-align: left;"><br>
last I checked, OHCI is for USB 1.x, EHCI was for 2.0.<br><br>Thanks,<br>Hetz<br>-- <br>Skepticism is the lazy person&#39;s default position.<br>my blog (hebrew): <a href="http://benhamo.org">http://benhamo.org</a>
</div>

------=_Part_13981_13548286.1193056739841--