* [Qemu-devel] Port E9 hack
@ 2005-02-06 12:55 Thomas Petazzoni
2005-02-06 13:33 ` Magnus Damm
2005-02-06 13:44 ` Fabrice Bellard
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2005-02-06 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 399 bytes --]
Hello,
I had no feedback regarding my port E9 hack patch. Does that mean that
this functionnality is not desirable for Qemu ? Should I give up with this ?
Thanks,
Thomas
--
PETAZZONI Thomas - thomas.petazzoni@enix.org
http://thomas.enix.org - Jabber: thomas.petazzoni@jabber.dk
KOS: http://kos.enix.org/ - SOS: http://sos.enix.org
Fingerprint : 0BE1 4CF3 CEA4 AC9D CC6E 1624 F653 CB30 98D3 F7A7
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 256 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Port E9 hack
2005-02-06 12:55 [Qemu-devel] Port E9 hack Thomas Petazzoni
@ 2005-02-06 13:33 ` Magnus Damm
2005-02-06 13:44 ` Fabrice Bellard
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Magnus Damm @ 2005-02-06 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 13:55:19 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni
<thomas.petazzoni@enix.org> wrote:
> I had no feedback regarding my port E9 hack patch. Does that mean that
> this functionnality is not desirable for Qemu ? Should I give up with this ?
Give it up? No.
I would like to do some bios hacking in the future and I therefore
welcome this feature.
/ magnus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Port E9 hack
2005-02-06 12:55 [Qemu-devel] Port E9 hack Thomas Petazzoni
2005-02-06 13:33 ` Magnus Damm
@ 2005-02-06 13:44 ` Fabrice Bellard
2005-02-06 14:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Fabrice Bellard @ 2005-02-06 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
> I had no feedback regarding my port E9 hack patch. Does that mean that
> this functionnality is not desirable for Qemu ? Should I give up with
> this ?
Don't worry, it will be merged someday. Just a question : why did you
code it as if there were several port E9 devices ?
Fabrice.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Port E9 hack
2005-02-06 13:44 ` Fabrice Bellard
@ 2005-02-06 14:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2005-02-06 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 572 bytes --]
Hello,
Fabrice Bellard a écrit :
> Don't worry, it will be merged someday. Just a question : why did you
> code it as if there were several port E9 devices ?
Just because I code it like serial and parallel port. I wasn't sure of
how you wanted it to be coded.
I can modify the patch to correct this, if needed.
Thomas
--
PETAZZONI Thomas - thomas.petazzoni@enix.org
http://thomas.enix.org - Jabber: thomas.petazzoni@jabber.dk
KOS: http://kos.enix.org/ - SOS: http://sos.enix.org
Fingerprint : 0BE1 4CF3 CEA4 AC9D CC6E 1624 F653 CB30 98D3 F7A7
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 256 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-02-06 15:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-02-06 12:55 [Qemu-devel] Port E9 hack Thomas Petazzoni
2005-02-06 13:33 ` Magnus Damm
2005-02-06 13:44 ` Fabrice Bellard
2005-02-06 14:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).