From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CzcRd-0000Wq-8W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:10:57 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CzcRZ-0000Us-LS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:10:54 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CzcRZ-0000Te-6D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:10:53 -0500 Received: from [195.129.94.252] (helo=srv94-252.ip-tech.ch) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1CzcC0-0002YK-7H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 09:54:48 -0500 Message-ID: <420CC0DC.1060909@kberg.ch> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:27:40 +0100 From: Mike Kronenberg MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] image size - OS reports 720mb, but image file is 2.3 gig References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Joe Bogner , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Have you tried to defrag your Partition? If you only have one block of data and one block of free space, compression will be much more effective. G V