From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D0Ck1-0002AJ-SZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 00:56:23 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D0Cjm-00024y-9D for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 00:56:07 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D0Cjl-0001yj-J2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 00:56:05 -0500 Received: from [203.190.192.17] (helo=wasp.net.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D0C5s-0006ik-UY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 00:14:53 -0500 Message-ID: <420EE242.2080908@wasp.net.au> Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 09:14:42 +0400 From: Brad Campbell MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KQEMU bus errors References: <1108086522.5629.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> <420EB226.4010301@thechesterfields.org> <41e41e7a0502121817746fc443@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <41e41e7a0502121817746fc443@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hetz Ben Hamo wrote: > Yes, found the reason... > > Test with different ram size - you'll be surprised... > I second this one. I found I had to make sure my tmpfs "partition" was larger than my requested ram size. Problem went away. Brad -- "Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so." -- Douglas Adams