From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D18KT-0003Uu-4U
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:25:49 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D18KK-0003SS-0D
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:25:40 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D18KJ-0003L2-2G
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:25:39 -0500
Received: from [66.124.73.250] (helo=marvin.brittainweb.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
	(Exim 4.34) id 1D17uS-0001Ex-Sd
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 13:58:57 -0500
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by marvin.brittainweb.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j1FIsUwX018224
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:54:30 -0800
Message-ID: <421245A0.2080502@brittainweb.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:55:28 -0800
From: Jason Brittain <jason@brittainweb.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] kqemu vs Standard
References: <Pine.LNX.4.43.0502151927070.645-100000@thinkpad.gardas.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.43.0502151927070.645-100000@thinkpad.gardas.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Karel Gardas wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Jason Brittain wrote:
> 
>>Here's my real (laptop) hardware's CPU info:
>># cat /proc/cpuinfo
>>processor       : 0
>>vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
>>cpu family      : 6
>>model           : 13
>>model name      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.80GHz
>>stepping        : 6
>>cpu MHz         : 599.679
> 
> I just wonder, but do you usually work with CPU clocked-down? Or have you
> tested running on battery?

Interesting!  I wrote the email about all this while riding to work on
the subway.  So, when I did the "cat /proc/cpuinfo", I was indeed running
on battery power.  But, currently, I'm not, and still says the same thing.

Anyone know what the deal is with that?  Is that an accurate number
saying that my cpu is throttled down?  Could I make it run faster then?
Hmmmm..

-- 
Jason Brittain