From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46395) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fiJCZ-0004NZ-9o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 08:47:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fiJCW-0005bH-35 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 08:47:35 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48144) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fiJCV-0005Zt-Oe for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 08:47:31 -0400 Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 08:47:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Pankaj Gupta Message-ID: <4226742.54063347.1532522849803.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20180713075232.9575-1-pagupta@redhat.com> <20180713075232.9575-4-pagupta@redhat.com> <783786ae-2e85-2376-448c-1e362c3d4d48@redhat.com> <399916154.53931292.1532494899706.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v3] qemu: Add virtio pmem device List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, haozhong zhang , nilal@redhat.com, jack@suse.cz, xiaoguangrong eric , kvm@vger.kernel.org, riel@surriel.com, linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org, david@redhat.com, ross zwisler , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, hch@infradead.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, niteshnarayanlal@hotmail.com, imammedo@redhat.com, dan j williams , lcapitulino@redhat.com > > >> > >> This patch has no n/M in the subject line; but is included in a thread > >> that also has a 0/2 cover letter, as well as 1/2 and 2/2 patches in > >> separate mails. Is that intentional? > > > > Yes, kernel series has 0-2 patches and Qemu has this one. I thought its > > good to keep separate numbering for both the sets. > > Ah, that makes sense. The cover letter didn't make it obvious to me that > this was two separate series to two projects, but related enough that > both series have to be incorporated for the feature to work and thus > cross-posted under a single cover letter. Will try to make it more clear in next posting. Thanks, Pankaj