From: Struan Bartlett <struan@praguespringpeople.org>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qvm86, kqemu and video speed
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 10:06:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <425CD2F0.2030400@praguespringpeople.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <425C21E8.6090306@bellard.org>
Fabrice Bellard wrote:
> Alex Beregszaszi wrote:
>
>>> Struan Bartlett wrote:
>>>
>>> I understand qvm86 and kqemu provide some virtualisation of the host
>>> machine, including allowing the guest some direct memory access. Is
>>> it conceivable for these modules to be extended to allow the guest
>>> machine to directly write to host video memory, or else to a host
>>> memory buffer that is copied into the Qemu window?
>>
>> I'm working on such a Direct Host Graphics custom "videocard".
>
> You can do that, but there is also a lot of optimisation opportunities
> in the existing Cirrus driver. My feeling is that using a driver for a
> virtual card will add only marginal gains (except in 3d) for a bigger
> amount of work (you need specific drivers in the guest OSes).
>
> For example, in the Cirrus driver, it could be possible for the
> virtual CPU to access the virtual frame buffer (currently a callback
> is always used). A specific virtual CPU support is needed to change
> dynamically the type of a physical memory mapping - that's why I did
> not implement it when I enhanced the Cirrus driver. It will be even
> more critical soon with a more optimized version of kqemu.
Thanks Fabrice for Qemu and for your input to this question. What you
describe sounds like the sort of thing I was imagining. Are you
suggesting your next version of kqemu will provide the "specific virtual
CPU support" needed to do this? If so, please keep us posted.
> Moreover, it could be possible to suppress one memcpy from the virtual
> frame buffer to the SDL/X11 frame buffer, and another memcpy if full
> screen mode is used (in this case, the virtual CPU accesses directly
> the host frame buffer).
>
> Finally, the Cirrus bitblt operations could be redirected to the
> corresponding X11 DGA operations in full screen mode.
Or, do you think, as James Mastros suggested, the corresponding SDL
operations in non-full-screen mode?
Struan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-13 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-11 14:07 [Qemu-devel] qvm86, kqemu and video speed Struan Bartlett
2005-04-11 15:01 ` James Mastros
2005-04-11 15:17 ` Paul Brook
2005-04-11 15:35 ` Struan Bartlett
2005-04-11 21:51 ` Struan Bartlett
2005-04-15 8:54 ` Struan Bartlett
2005-04-12 3:13 ` Darryl Dixon
2005-04-11 21:53 ` Struan Bartlett
2005-04-12 16:38 ` Alex Beregszaszi
2005-04-12 19:30 ` Fabrice Bellard
2005-04-13 3:57 ` use.reply-to.address
2005-04-13 8:06 ` Struan Bartlett [this message]
2005-04-13 18:12 ` Hetz Ben Hamo
2005-04-13 19:24 ` Leonardo E. Reiter
2005-04-13 20:09 ` Leonardo E. Reiter
2005-04-14 9:42 ` Thomas Steffen
2005-04-18 7:32 ` Oliver Gerlich
2005-04-19 6:15 ` emuls
2005-04-13 21:12 ` Jim C. Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=425CD2F0.2030400@praguespringpeople.org \
--to=struan@praguespringpeople.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).