From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DbfoH-0001qN-Ir for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 May 2005 10:27:38 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DbfoC-0001n8-B1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 May 2005 10:27:32 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DbfoC-0001mj-23 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 May 2005 10:27:32 -0400 Received: from [195.129.94.252] (helo=srv94-252.ip-tech.ch) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1Dbfls-0002Jf-TT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 May 2005 10:25:09 -0400 Message-ID: <42972D8C.9040509@kberg.ch> Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 16:24:12 +0200 From: Mike Kronenberg MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] cocoa.m References: <429707A8.4040400@kberg.ch> <9E471473-9F28-4067-87BE-54317B17FC80@claunia.com> In-Reply-To: <9E471473-9F28-4067-87BE-54317B17FC80@claunia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Natalia Portillo wrote: > > El 27/05/2005, a las 12:42, Mike Kronenberg escribió: > >> >> -cocoalivethumbnail => qemu produces a 100x75 PNG thumbnail >> every 10 sec > > GREAT!!! > > But, better if can be specified how many time and/or a shortcut (like > in virtualpc) > > > > _______________________________________________ > Qemu-devel mailing list > Qemu-devel@nongnu.org > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel I'll put that on my todo list. btw: The patch provides two thumbnailer: quality and fast - quality: just grabs the whole screen and makes a downsample => slow but nice - fast: just grabs the needed bits from current_ds => like pixel resample in PS :) => BUT if you use fast, half of the pic is ok, and half is garbage so if someone could look over it and find the bug, that would be great. one could even use a 32bit pointer to further reduce the cpu time needed for the thumb. Mike