From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DhUJf-0008CG-Lj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 11:24:03 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DhUJc-0008Ae-Po for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 11:24:01 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DhUJc-00089G-N7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 11:24:00 -0400 Received: from [193.70.192.51] (helo=smtp1.libero.it) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DhUGS-0001in-Vu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 11:20:45 -0400 Received: from localhost (172.16.1.84) by smtp1.libero.it (7.0.027-DD01) id 41BDB2AB027FF3A6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 17:19:48 +0200 Received: from [192.168.0.1] (151.44.52.156) by smtp20.libero.it (7.0.027-DD01) id 41D02BD3070EC010 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 17:19:42 +0200 Message-ID: <42AC5289.8050204@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 17:19:37 +0200 From: Luca Barbato MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu 0.7.0 does not compile with binutils 2.16 References: <200506101954.54208.dev@gioelebarabucci.com> <0CPFBV.1843673238QWCMY@kevquinn.com> In-Reply-To: <0CPFBV.1843673238QWCMY@kevquinn.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Kevin F. Quinn wrote: > On 10/6/2005 19:54:53, Gioele Barabucci (dev@gioelebarabucci.com) wrote: > > >>I tried to compile qemu 0.7.0 on my gentoo-ppc box. > > ... > >>I used gcc-3.4.3, binutils 2.16 and gentoo's glibc 2.3.4.20041102-r1 with > NPTL. > > > Posting a bug to Gentoo's bugzilla would be a good idea (http://bugs.gentoo.org). > Since binutils-2.16 is ~ppc (i.e. being tested), you could try the latest stable > version of binutils (2.15.90.0.3-r5). That would demonstrate whether it's a > binutils issue or not. The problem got already reported in the gentoo bugzilla and in the binutils bugzilla. As I wrote before the issue is in the linker scripts. isn't a ld problems (it does the right thing) nor a distribution problem (I'm not so keen on use a older and probably with more issues open version) lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux Developer Gentoo/PPC Operational Leader http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero