From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dhk7w-0003BK-TK
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 04:17:00 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dhk7t-0003Aa-Tp
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 04:16:59 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dhk7Z-0002zE-Nw
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 04:16:38 -0400
Received: from [195.129.94.252] (helo=srv94-252.ip-tech.ch)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1Dhk4q-00071W-Tw
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 04:13:49 -0400
Message-ID: <42AD3FD8.9060806@kberg.ch>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:12:08 +0200
From: Mike Kronenberg <mike.kronenberg@kberg.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] OS X Package Maintainer
References: <42A739D4.4090805@kberg.ch>	<446BE057-1776-43A0-8D99-8616A3BDA985@claunia.com>
	<200506111158.18749.julian@valgrind.org>
In-Reply-To: <200506111158.18749.julian@valgrind.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Julian Seward wrote:

>>Can you make a nightly build with the CVS?
>>    
>>
>
>I'm surprised that Qemu does not seem to have an automated nightly
>build / regression test / mail-summary-to-developers system.  We have
>been doing that with Valgrind for a couple of years now and it makes 
>a big difference, allowing developers to track day-to-day stability
>of the system and to quickly see and fix build failures on different
>platforms.
>
>J
>
First, this is not a question of automatition, but where my box is at 
the time the build is generated :) I have some 24/7 linuxboxes - when I 
have a free os x box at hand, things will get even more automated. 
Second, Fabrice is very restrictive about CVS changes, which is a good 
thing for code quality.

Mike