From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DjB8R-000672-QA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 03:19:28 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DjB8O-00065W-2t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 03:19:25 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DjB8N-0005qt-2J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 03:19:23 -0400 Received: from [202.123.2.9] (helo=mail1.intnet.mu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DjAzk-0008Fn-Nh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 03:10:29 -0400 Received: from [10.0.0.2] ([196.192.100.60]) by mail1.intnet.mu (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id II7VTZ05.2W3 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 11:08:23 +0400 Message-ID: <42B276E6.2040807@secureit-mu.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 11:08:22 +0400 From: Josef Moffett MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] re: Nothing happens References: <4e39348605061606123222d205@mail.gmail.com> <42B18CB1.3000502@secureit-mu.com> <200506162247.32514.paul@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <200506162247.32514.paul@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Paul Brook wrote: >>In your configure output I notice you didn't have static versions of the >>SDL libraries available. This will limit the availability of the SDL >>support somewhat. >> >> > >In most cases it doesn't make any difference. Static SDL is only needed if >you're building qemu-fast or you're building everything as static libraries, >neither of which are the default. > >Paul > > >_______________________________________________ >Qemu-devel mailing list >Qemu-devel@nongnu.org >http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel > > Okay - a flood of replies. I am going to try the make clean, etc again. I seem to remember doing it, but can't be 100% sure so better try that. I did do the ./configure though because that gave me the option for SDL or no SDL. Thanks for all the replies, I'll report back on that as soon as I've tried it - ie in about 10mins ;-) Cheers Joe