From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DxQQN-0001kk-Og for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:28:52 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DxQQB-0001cE-2r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:28:39 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DxQQA-0001b2-At for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:28:38 -0400 Received: from [83.175.144.121] (helo=chilan.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1DxQYZ-0007qL-7E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:37:19 -0400 Message-ID: <42E647FA.4010305@kadu.net> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 16:26:02 +0200 From: Adrian Smarzewski MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] kqemu problem - linux amd64 host, win xp guest References: <42E5E88B.7000505@kadu.net> <42E64259.6020206@zipman.it> In-Reply-To: <42E64259.6020206@zipman.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Flavio Visentin wrote: > Did you try qvm86? Sometimes kqemu works better, sometimes qvm86 is > the best choice, sometimes nothing is better than not using > acceleration. :-) > > Ususally I try all the three solutions and the problem goes away. no. is qvm86 ready to run win xp on amd64 host? -- Pozdrowienia, Adrian Smarzewski