From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dyywx-0005vI-9h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:32:55 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dyywq-0005ro-1a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:32:49 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dyywo-0005mu-Pe for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:32:46 -0400 Received: from [195.250.128.75] (helo=smtp2.vol.cz) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Dyysn-0007qJ-Er for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:28:37 -0400 Received: from [10.0.0.2] (prg-v-6-220.static.adsl.vol.cz [62.177.70.220]) by smtp2.vol.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B6D960EE6 for ; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 23:16:27 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <42EBEE2C.5070004@reactos.com> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 23:16:28 +0200 From: Filip Navara MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Patch Submission] QEMU with GCC/Win32 References: <42EBCA12.80603@steveperkins.net> <200507302013.22433.paul@codesourcery.com> <42EBD7E3.7090409@steveperkins.net> In-Reply-To: <42EBD7E3.7090409@steveperkins.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi! Steve D. Perkins wrote: > Paul Brook wrote: > >> Are you sure you included the correct patch? >> >> I don't see anything win32 specific about this patch. AFAICS it's >> just the gcc4 patch *that I wrote* and posed some time ago. >> Both cygwin and mingw is still using gcc3.4.x, so it shouldn't be >> necessary. > It is needed for gcc 3.4.x on MinGW. GCC 3.3.x works just fine. > Paul - [snip] > I get the impression that QEMU is not really being tested on the > Win32/GCC platform, so the team (is there a "team" or is it really > just Fabrice?) may not be aware that support is still lacking for that > platform. [snip] I think this is false impression. I'm testing the Win32 version frequently and if any compilation problem arises I try to send the patches back (though I've been lacking in that lately) ... - Filip