qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PULL v2 01/46] qemu-iotests: move check-block back to Makefiles
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 13:05:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42d1edc2-228b-220c-8db8-251cb83c964b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <98f7869a-cb45-08b5-670a-ebc47254b0c2@redhat.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1140 bytes --]

On 11.09.20 12:58, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 06.09.20 19:53, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> check-block has its own test harness, unlike every other test.  If
>> we capture its output, as is in general nicer to do without V=1,
>> there will be no sign of progress.  So for lack of a better option
>> just move the invocation of the test back to Makefile rules.
>>
>> As a side effect, this will also fix "make check" in --disable-tools
>> builds, as they were trying to run qemu-iotests without having
>> made qemu-img before.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  meson.build                    |  1 -
>>  tests/Makefile.include         | 15 ++++++++++++---
>>  tests/qemu-iotests/meson.build |  4 ----
>>  3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> I’m not entirely sure why (or I would’ve sent a patch myself)

On closer inspection it seems like it’s because of the
“build_by_default: false”, which seems like a rather conscious decision.
 Was I only lucky that the socket_scm_helper was built by default so
far?  Should I have explicitly built it all this time?

Max


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-11 11:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-06 17:53 [PULL v2 00/46] Next round of Meson bugfixes and cleanups Paolo Bonzini
2020-09-06 17:53 ` [PULL v2 01/46] qemu-iotests: move check-block back to Makefiles Paolo Bonzini
2020-09-11 10:58   ` Max Reitz
2020-09-11 11:05     ` Max Reitz [this message]
2020-09-11 11:19       ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-09-11 11:17     ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-09-06 18:34 ` [PULL v2 00/46] Next round of Meson bugfixes and cleanups Peter Maydell
2020-09-07  2:56   ` 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42d1edc2-228b-220c-8db8-251cb83c964b@redhat.com \
    --to=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).