From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E8kzY-0002PY-Hn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 16:40:01 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E8kzT-0002MT-29 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 16:39:55 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E8kzR-0002IW-J4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 16:39:53 -0400 Received: from [84.96.92.55] (helo=smtP.neuf.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1E8khy-0007CG-Lk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 16:21:50 -0400 Received: from [84.99.204.49] by sp604004mt.gpm.neuf.ld (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-3.03 (built Jun 27 2005)) with ESMTP id <0ILU00A1KJ4Z0GN0@sp604004mt.gpm.neuf.ld> for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 22:19:47 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 22:20:36 +0200 From: Fabrice Bellard Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Network Performance between Win Host and Linux Guest In-reply-to: <20050826135715.4A82BBADE1@dd3532.kasserver.com> Message-id: <430F7994.5050600@bellard.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <20050826135715.4A82BBADE1@dd3532.kasserver.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org vdr@helmutauer.de wrote: > Hi, QEMU is working better from hour to hour :-) Now I am looking for > a way to get my data from the linux client to the Win2K host. When I > use the integrated smb I get a transfer rate from about 15 KB :-( the > tftp is about 600 KBps and using WinSCP over the "redired" ssh > connection lead to 60 KBps. Is there a way to transfer the data > faster ? Or is there an explorer for the disk image available ? > Thanks in advance Helmut I guess the best way is to understand why the network is so slow. This is a bug in SLIRP ou the NE2000 emulated card, not something due to the CPU emulation itself. Fabrice.