From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38063) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eC2mO-0004cT-I1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 07:14:59 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eC2mM-0000Fr-Aa for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2017 07:14:56 -0500 Sender: Richard Henderson References: <1a04d2a2-98cc-5ef7-ace4-6836a1c9ec94@redhat.com> From: Richard Henderson Message-ID: <430a5ef2-99ff-03e2-c3e3-01448e1862b9@twiddle.net> Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 13:14:31 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1a04d2a2-98cc-5ef7-ace4-6836a1c9ec94@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] target-s390x: assertion failure in op_risbg List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Thomas Huth , Peter Maydell , QEMU Developers Cc: Alexander Graf , qemu-s390x@nongnu.org On 11/07/2017 01:00 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: > If I've got the spec right, it's doing the same as > RISBG (with subcode 0x55), but just does not set the condition code at > the end, so this should be quite easy to implement? That's right. r~