From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ELzF0-0004mk-5c
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 04:30:40 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ELz5P-0005H7-MI
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 04:21:14 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ELyuj-0004Qf-6Q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 04:09:45 -0400
Received: from [144.85.15.72] (helo=mail.eclis.ch)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ELyiU-0008Kw-Fs
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 03:57:02 -0400
Message-ID: <433F92CB.1060600@eclis.ch>
Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2005 09:56:59 +0200
From: Jean-Christian de Rivaz <jc@eclis.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] tun/tap networking: patch for existing tun
References: <20050930221321.C7BED31C14@ravel.n2.net>	<20050930230149.GA20433@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org>	<433E44F9.8040501@eclis.ch>	<20051001131215.GB28444@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org>	<433EF5C4.2030801@eclis.ch>
	<Pine.LNX.4.61.0510020441150.21519@filer.marasystems.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0510020441150.21519@filer.marasystems.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Henrik Nordstrom a =E9crit :
> On Sat, 1 Oct 2005, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote:
>=20
>> Attached is a patch proposition to allow opennig an existing tun=20
>> (already configured by root).
>>
>> This patch can work only on Linux as it make no change into the code=20
>> for BSD.
>>
>> Please make open comment about this to improve it or to let my know=20
>> why this if not a good thing...
>=20
>=20
> Quite similar to my patch posted some many months ago (and reposted som=
e=20
> week ago on request).

Yes. This is just an update of my first patch posted the 13 january 2005=20
so it should apply without offset warning.

Maybe can I propose to joint our effort ?
--=20
Jean-Christian de Rivaz