From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ERUTN-0007Fu-Dx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:52:13 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ERUTL-0007Fh-Vu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:52:13 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ERUTH-0007Fb-VR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:52:09 -0400 Received: from [203.190.192.17] (helo=wasp.net.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ERUTH-0005Rq-V5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 08:52:08 -0400 Message-ID: <43539EA6.4070602@wasp.net.au> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:52:54 +0400 From: Brad Campbell MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] "Issue" With non-blocking IO patch References: <4353909B.3040109@wasp.net.au> <4353998B.5060602@stanfordalumni.org> In-Reply-To: <4353998B.5060602@stanfordalumni.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: John Coiner Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org John Coiner wrote: > > I can't reproduce this. Please check two things: > > 1. In "block.c", the first two lines of the "bdrv_cancel_nonblock_io" > function should read: > > if( bs->nbst.booted && > bs->nbst.state != STATE_IDLE ) { > > There was a bugfix here, in the most recent version of the patch, and if > you didn't have the bugfix, you'd get the error you're getting. Yep, my patch was an older one.. Thanks for the prompt reply. Recompiling now Regards, Brad -- "Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so." -- Douglas Adams