From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EU9VE-0002CB-5z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 17:05:08 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EU9VC-0002Bk-IO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 17:05:07 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EU9VC-0002Bg-2P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 17:05:06 -0400 Received: from [81.187.81.52] (helo=smtp.aaisp.net.uk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1EU9VB-0007CX-UC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 17:05:06 -0400 Received: from [81.187.40.226] (helo=[81.187.40.226]) by smtp.aaisp.net.uk with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1EU9V9-0008KK-CI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 22:05:04 +0100 Message-ID: <435D4C76.4010306@hermes.cam.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 22:04:54 +0100 From: Richard Neill MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Qemu-devel digest getting wrongly marked as spam Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Dear All, I thought that someone on here might like to know that Spam Assassin really doesn't like this list! I don't know why, and Qemu is the only false positive I get. Anyway, here's what Spam Assassin says: X-Cam-SpamScore: ssssss X-Cam-SpamDetails: scanned, SpamAssassin (score=6.897, MISSING_DATE 0.02, NO_REAL_NAME 0.18, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 1.49, RAZOR2_CHECK 0.15, URIBL_SBL 0.63, URIBL_SC_SURBL 3.90, URIBL_WS_SURBL 0.54) I hope that this is of some use to someone :-) Best wishes, Richard