From: "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@redhat.com>
To: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>,
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>
Cc: alex.williamson@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com,
chao.p.peng@intel.com, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
"open list:S390 general arch..." <qemu-s390x@nongnu.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] vfio/ccw: Don't initialize HOST_IOMMU_DEVICE with mdev
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 17:36:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4369ce16-0b40-4df3-8db0-276bb0887fa0@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3072c39e-fd1b-4cc1-a189-2aa64a1d5984@oracle.com>
On 7/22/24 17:09, Joao Martins wrote:
> On 22/07/2024 15:57, Eric Farman wrote:
>> On Mon, 2024-07-22 at 15:07 +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
>>> mdevs aren't "physical" devices and when asking for backing IOMMU info,
>>> it fails the entire provisioning of the guest. Fix that by setting
>>> vbasedev->mdev true so skipping HostIOMMUDevice initialization in the
>>> presence of mdevs.
>>
>> Hmm, picking the two commits that Cedric mentioned in his cover-letter reply [1] doesn't "fail the entire provisioning of the guest" for me.
>>
>> Applying this patch on top of that causes the call from vfio_attach_device() to hiod_legacy_vfio_realize() to be skipped, which seems odd. What am I missing?
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/4c9a184b-514c-4276-95ca-9ed86623b9a4@redhat.com/
>>
>
> If you are using IOMMUFD it will fail the entire provisioning i.e. GET_HW_INFO
> fails because there's no actual device/IOMMU you can probe hardware information
> from and you can't start a guest. This happened at least for me in x86 vfio-pci
> mdevs (or at least I reproduced it when trying to test mdev_tty)
>
> But if you don't support IOMMUFD, then it probably makes no difference as type1
> doesn't do anything particularly special besides initializing some static data.
> The realize is skipped because you technically don't have a physical host IOMMU
> directly behind the mdev, but rather some parent function related software
> entity doing that for you.
>
> Zhengzhong noticed there were some other mdevs aside from vfio-pci and in an
> attempt to prevent regression elsewhere it posted for the other mdevs in qemu.
yes. I confirm with :
-device vfio-ap,id=hostdev0,sysfsdev=/sys/bus/mdev/devices/8eb8351a-e656-4187-b773-fea4e926310d,iommufd=iommufd0 \
-object iommufd,id=iommufd0 \
-trace 'iommufd*'
iommufd_cdev_getfd /dev/vfio/devices/vfio4 (fd=28)
iommufd_backend_connect fd=27 owned=1 users=1
iommufd_cdev_connect_and_bind [iommufd=27] Successfully bound device 8eb8351a-e656-4187-b773-fea4e926310d (fd=28): output devid=1
iommufd_backend_alloc_ioas iommufd=27 ioas=2
iommufd_cdev_alloc_ioas [iommufd=27] new IOMMUFD container with ioasid=2
iommufd_cdev_attach_ioas_hwpt [iommufd=27] Successfully attached device 8eb8351a-e656-4187-b773-fea4e926310d (28) to id=2
iommufd_backend_map_dma iommufd=27 ioas=2 iova=0x0 size=0x200000000 addr=0x3fd9ff00000 readonly=0 (0)
iommufd_cdev_device_info 8eb8351a-e656-4187-b773-fea4e926310d (28) num_irqs=1 num_regions=0 flags=33
iommufd_cdev_detach_ioas_hwpt [iommufd=27] Successfully detached 8eb8351a-e656-4187-b773-fea4e926310d
iommufd_backend_unmap_dma iommufd=27 ioas=2 iova=0x0 size=0x200000000 (0)
iommufd_backend_free_id iommufd=27 id=2 (0)
iommufd_backend_disconnect fd=-1 users=0
qemu-kvm: -device vfio-ap,id=hostdev0,sysfsdev=/sys/bus/mdev/devices/8eb8351a-e656-4187-b773-fea4e926310d,iommufd=iommufd0: vfio 8eb8351a-e656-4187-b773-fea4e926310d: Failed to get hardware info: No such file or directory
Thanks,
C.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-22 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-22 7:07 [PATCH 0/2] Don't initialize HOST_IOMMU_DEVICE with mdev Zhenzhong Duan
2024-07-22 7:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] vfio/ap: " Zhenzhong Duan
2024-07-22 9:18 ` Joao Martins
2024-07-22 15:46 ` Anthony Krowiak
2024-07-22 15:52 ` Joao Martins
2024-07-22 7:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] vfio/ccw: " Zhenzhong Duan
2024-07-22 9:18 ` Joao Martins
2024-07-22 14:57 ` Eric Farman
2024-07-22 15:09 ` Joao Martins
2024-07-22 15:36 ` Cédric Le Goater [this message]
2024-07-22 17:45 ` Eric Farman
2024-07-23 2:52 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2024-07-22 9:31 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Eric Auger
2024-07-22 10:02 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-07-22 13:50 ` Cédric Le Goater
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4369ce16-0b40-4df3-8db0-276bb0887fa0@redhat.com \
--to=clg@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@intel.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=zhenzhong.duan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).