From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EbkZv-0007EV-GX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:05:23 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EbkZt-0007Dm-ED for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:05:22 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EbkZs-0007DV-SP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:05:21 -0500 Received: from [84.96.92.56] (helo=smTp.neuf.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EbkZs-0007pb-Fw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:05:20 -0500 Received: from [84.102.211.54] by sp604003mt.gpm.neuf.ld (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.03 (built Sep 22 2005)) with ESMTP id <0IPY00405MT70BL0@sp604003mt.gpm.neuf.ld> for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 20:43:55 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 20:45:30 +0100 From: Fabrice Bellard Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] GCC 4 patches In-reply-to: Message-id: <4378E95A.9080805@bellard.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Gwenole Beauchesne wrote: > [...] > IMHO, it's not worth looking hard at compiling QEMU with GCC 4 on x86. The > new hand written backend is a better alternative. This is my opinion too ! Fabrice.