From: ace <acelists@atlas.sk>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] fix QEMU hang after hibernate
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 21:09:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <437A4093.7050306@atlas.sk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4349FB21.9040205@stanfordalumni.org>
I can confirm this patch applied alone to 0.7.2 did something for me. I
suspended the PC for 1 minute (just to reboot the machine) and after
resume, my quest win95 was still working. I will of course try longer
periods later.
Peter
John Coiner wrote:
>
> After I hibernate my x86 linux host machine (using the "swsusp2"
> package) and resume, QEMU and guest hang. That is odd, because
> hibernation is transparent to all other user programs.
>
> Has anyone else noticed this? If so please try the patch.
>
> You know QEMU is doing something weird, for it to be sensitive to
> hibernation. Indeed, the cause is something you don't see every day:
>
> QEMU implements timers partly by reading the CPU's tick counter directly
> from hardware, with an architecture-specific assembly instruction
> ('rdtsc' on intel, and so on for other archs) rather than using purely
> OS-provided features to get the time.
>
> The problem is that following hibernation, the CPU tick counter isn't
> what it used to be. On my host, it has a lower value -- it jumped
> backwards. This breaks QEMU's timers. Some of them decide to block for a
> very long time, which causes the guest to hang or behave oddly.
>
> (Maybe this is technically a bug in "swsusp2", maybe it should restore
> the CPU tick counter to the previous value upon resume. But who cares.
> It's easy to fix this in QEMU, and it would not be easy to check and fix
> all hibernation schemes on all architectures and operating systems.)
>
> The following patch fixes the 'cpu_get_ticks()' function to always
> return a non-decreasing value, even if the value read from hardware
> decreases. Hope it helps. Feedback is welcome.
>
> -- John
>
>
>
> --- qemu-0.7.2-dmapatch/vl.c 2005-09-04 13:11:31.000000000 -0400
> +++ qemu-0.7.2-broken/vl.c 2005-10-10 00:54:08.000000000 -0400
> @@ -545,14 +547,21 @@
> #error unsupported CPU
> #endif
>
> -static int64_t cpu_ticks_offset;
> -static int cpu_ticks_enabled;
> +static int64_t cpu_ticks_prev = 0;
> +static int64_t cpu_ticks_offset = 0;
> +static int cpu_ticks_enabled = 0;
>
> static inline int64_t cpu_get_ticks(void)
> {
> if (!cpu_ticks_enabled) {
> return cpu_ticks_offset;
> } else {
> + int64_t ticks = cpu_get_real_ticks();
> + if( cpu_ticks_prev > ticks )
> + {
> + cpu_ticks_offset += ( cpu_ticks_prev - ticks );
> + }
> + cpu_ticks_prev = ticks;
> return cpu_get_real_ticks() + cpu_ticks_offset;
> }
> }
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qemu-devel mailing list
> Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
>
>
>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-15 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-10 5:24 [Qemu-devel] [patch] fix QEMU hang after hibernate John Coiner
2005-11-15 20:09 ` ace [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=437A4093.7050306@atlas.sk \
--to=acelists@atlas.sk \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).