From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Eebey-0006s4-8T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 12:10:24 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Eebev-0006pq-Oq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 12:10:22 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eebet-0006pT-5s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 12:10:21 -0500 Received: from [32.97.110.152] (helo=e34.co.us.ibm.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1Eebet-0001ub-0U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 12:10:19 -0500 Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e34.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jAMHAHu6005469 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 12:10:17 -0500 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.167]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.8) with ESMTP id jAMHBcOW094768 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:11:38 -0700 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jAMHAGig021092 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:10:16 -0700 Message-ID: <438350EF.9040207@us.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:10:07 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] x86 Virtualization References: <200511212040.37837.dfeustel@verizon.net> <200511220635.59845.dfeustel@verizon.net> <200511221405.51801.mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk> <200511221008.29077.dfeustel@verizon.net> In-Reply-To: <200511221008.29077.dfeustel@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: dfeustel@mindspring.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Dave Feustel wrote: >On Tuesday 22 November 2005 09:05, Mark Williamson wrote: > > >>Have you seen AMD's SimNow? Not quite what you want, I know, but better than >>nothing ;-) >> >> > >I downloaded SimNow and was in the midst of installing it before I realized that >it would only work on AMD64 computers running Linux. I have a 32-bit machine >running OpenBSD. ( I'm now wearing my eyeglasses again. :-) ) > > I've been able to run SimNow within qemu-x86_64 on a 32 bit host. Yes, I'm sadistic :-) Regards, Anthony Liguori >I have had such good results even with the downlevel 0.6.1 qemu (and I'm in the >process of upgrading to 7.1/7.2) that I am no longer looking at any other simulators. > >Dave Feustel > > >>On Tuesday 22 November 2005 11:35, Dave Feustel wrote: >> >> >>>On Monday 21 November 2005 23:43, Jim C. Brown wrote: >>> >>> >>>>On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 08:40:37PM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>Are there any plans to add to qemu the capability to simulate the >>>>>Intel Vanderpool and AMD Pacifica hardware virtualization facilities? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>You'd think that people would check the mailing list archives before >>>>asking the same questions that others have asked over and over again. >>>> >>>> >>>Thanks for the suggestion. It hadn't occurred to me to look for an archive, >>>but I have it bookmarked now. >>> >>> > > >